 |
|
|
Item Details
| Title:
|
HUMAN DEPENDENCY AND CHRISTIAN ETHICS
|
| By: |
Sandra Sullivan-Dunbar |
| Format: |
Hardback |
| List price:
|
£93.99 |
| Our price: |
£84.59 |
| Discount: |
|
| You save:
|
£9.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ISBN 10: |
1107168899 |
| ISBN 13: |
9781107168893 |
| Availability: |
Usually dispatched within 1-3 weeks.
 Delivery
rates
|
| Stock: |
Currently 0 available |
| Publisher: |
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS |
| Pub. date: |
30 September, 2017 |
| Series: |
New Studies in Christian Ethics |
| Pages: |
264 |
| Description: |
This book engages Christian love theologies, feminist economics, and political theory to identify elements of a Christian ethic of dependent care relations. |
| Synopsis: |
Dependency is a central aspect of human existence, as are dependent care relations: relations between caregivers and young children, persons with disabilities, or frail elderly persons. In this book, Sandra Sullivan-Dunbar argues that many prominent interpretations of Christian love either obscure dependency and care, or fail to adequately address injustice in the global social organization of care. Sullivan-Dunbar engages a wide-ranging interdisciplinary conversation between Christian ethics and economics, political theory, and care scholarship, drawing on the rich body of recent feminist work reintegrating dependency and care into the economic, political, and moral spheres. She identifies essential elements of a Christian ethic of love and justice for dependent care relations in a globalized care economy. She also suggests resources for such an ethic ranging from Catholic social thought, feminist political ethics of care, disability and vulnerability studies, and Christian theological accounts of the divine-human relation. |
| Publication: |
UK |
| Imprint: |
Cambridge University Press |
| Returns: |
Returnable |
|
|
|
 |
Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr
A celebratory, inclusive and educational exploration of Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr for both children that celebrate and children who want to understand and appreciate their peers who do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|