 |
|
|
Item Details
| Title:
|
WHY AMERICA'S TOP PUNDITS ARE WRONG
ANTHROPOLOGISTS TALK BACK |
| By: |
C. Besteman (Editor), Hugh Gusterson (Editor) |
| Format: |
Paperback |
| List price:
|
£25.00 |
| Our price: |
£20.00 |
| Discount: |
|
| You save:
|
£5.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ISBN 10: |
0520243560 |
| ISBN 13: |
9780520243569 |
| Availability: |
Usually dispatched within 1-3 weeks.
 Delivery
rates
|
| Stock: |
Currently 0 available |
| Publisher: |
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS |
| Pub. date: |
10 December, 2004 |
| Series: |
California Series in Public Anthropology v. 13 |
| Pages: |
282 |
| Synopsis: |
In this fresh, literate, and biting critique of current thinking on some of today's most important and controversial topics, leading anthropologists take on some of America's top pundits. This absorbing collection of essays subjects such popular commentators as Thomas Friedman, Samuel Huntington, Robert Kaplan, and Dinesh D'Souza to cold, hard scrutiny and finds that their writing is often misleadingly simplistic, culturally ill-informed, and politically dangerous. Mixing critical reflection with insights from their own fieldwork, twelve distinguished anthropologists respond by offering fresh perspectives on globalization, ethnic violence, social justice, and the biological roots of behavior. They take on such topics as the collapse of Yugoslavia, the consumer practices of the American poor, American foreign policy in the Balkans, and contemporary debates over race, welfare, and violence against women. In the clear, vigorous prose of the pundits themselves, these contributors reveal the hollowness of what often passes as prevailing wisdom and passionately demonstrate the need for a humanistically complex and democratic understanding of the contemporary world.Available: November 2004 Pub Date: January 2005 |
| Publication: |
US |
| Imprint: |
University of California Press |
| Returns: |
Returnable |
|
|
|
 |
Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr
A celebratory, inclusive and educational exploration of Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr for both children that celebrate and children who want to understand and appreciate their peers who do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|