 |
|
|
Item Details
| Title:
|
SHAKESPEARE, MILTON AND EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY LITERARY EDITING
THE BEGINNINGS OF INTERPRETATIVE SCHOLARSHIP |
| By: |
Marcus Walsh, Howard Erskine-Hill, John Richetti |
| Format: |
Hardback |
| List price:
|
£84.00 |
| Our price: |
£73.50 |
| Discount: |
|
| You save:
|
£10.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ISBN 10: |
0521554438 |
| ISBN 13: |
9780521554435 |
| Availability: |
Usually dispatched within 1-3 weeks.
 Delivery
rates
|
| Stock: |
Currently 0 available |
| Publisher: |
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS |
| Pub. date: |
28 June, 1997 |
| Series: |
Cambridge Studies in Eighteenth-Century English Literature & Thought No. 35 |
| Pages: |
240 |
| Description: |
Study of the theories and methods informing editions of Milton and Shakespeare in the eighteenth century. |
| Synopsis: |
The first developments in the editing of English literary texts in the eighteenth century were remarkable and important, and they have recently begun to attract considerable interest, particularly in relation to conditions and constructions of scholarship in the period. This study sets out to investigate, rather, the theoretical and interpretative bases of eighteenth-century literary editing. Extended chapters on Shakespearean and Miltonic commentary and editing demonstrate that the work of pioneering editors and commentators, such as Patrick Hume, Lewis Theobald, Zachary Pearce, and Edward Capell, was based on developed, sophisticated and often clearly articulated theories and methods of textual understanding and explanation. Marcus Walsh relates these interpretative theories and methods to seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Anglican biblical hermeneutics, and to a number of key debates in modern editorial theory. |
| Illustrations: |
12 b/w illus. |
| Publication: |
UK |
| Imprint: |
Cambridge University Press |
| Returns: |
Returnable |
|
|
|
 |
Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr
A celebratory, inclusive and educational exploration of Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr for both children that celebrate and children who want to understand and appreciate their peers who do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|