|
|
|
Item Details
Title:
|
CLASSICAL SOCIAL THEORY - A CONTEMPORARY APPROACH
|
By: |
Kenneth H. Tucker |
Format: |
Hardback |
List price:
|
£122.95 |
Our price: |
£110.66 |
Discount: |
|
You save:
|
£12.29 |
|
|
|
|
ISBN 10: |
0631211640 |
ISBN 13: |
9780631211648 |
Availability: |
Usually dispatched within 1-3 weeks.
Delivery
rates
|
Stock: |
Currently 0 available |
Publisher: |
JOHN WILEY AND SONS LTD |
Pub. date: |
3 September, 2001 |
Series: |
21st Century Sociology |
Pages: |
280 |
Description: |
This text explores the contemporary relevance of classical sociological theory. Tucker examines the work of Marx, Weber, and Durkheim through the lens of new theoretical issues, such as the role of Empire, and the possibilities of democracy implicit in each theorist's perspective. |
Synopsis: |
In this original text Kenneth Tucker explores the contemporary relevance of classical sociological theory. He examines the work of Marx, Weber and Durkheim through the lens of new theoretical issues, such as the role of Empire, the problem of cultural differences and the possibilities of democracy implicit in each theorist's perspective. While Tucker effectively summarizes each theorist's major ideas, he is most concerned with contemporary issues: what should be retained and what should be jettisoned from each theorist in order to discern today's world in light of a growing awareness of cultural identities and social differences. This leads to a discussion of how the sociological tradition can be understood in new ways, and includes the contributions of other theorists such as Freud, Simmel, Nietzsche, Perkins Gilman and Du Bois. In authoritative and accessible prose, Tucker outlines new directions of classical theory in a late modern or postmodern world. |
Publication: |
UK |
Imprint: |
Blackwell Publishers |
Returns: |
Returnable |
|
|
|
|
Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr
A celebratory, inclusive and educational exploration of Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr for both children that celebrate and children who want to understand and appreciate their peers who do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|