MICHAEL OF EPHESUS/ASPASIUS/ANONYMUS by Richard Sorabji (Editor) ( 9780715630716 )

Item Details

Title:

MICHAEL OF EPHESUS/ASPASIUS/ANONYMUS
ON ARISTOTLE "NICOMACHEAN"

By:

Format:

Hardback

List price:	£120.00
We currently do not stock this item, please contact the publisher directly for further information.

ISBN 10:

0715630717

ISBN 13:

9780715630716

Publisher:

BLOOMSBURY PUBLISHING PLC

Pub. date:

27 September, 2001

Series:

Ancient Commentators on Aristotle

Pages:

240

Description:

This text contains translations of three commentaries on Aristotle's "Nicomachean Ethics". Of the three, that by the second-century AD Aspasius is the earliest extant commentary on Aristotle; the second is by Michael of Ephesus in the twelfth century; the third is of unknown date and author.

Synopsis:

Aristotle devotes books 8-9 of the "Nicomachean Ethics" to friendship, distinguishing three kinds: a primary kind motivated by the other's character; and other kinds motivated by utility or pleasure. He takes up Plato's idea that one knows oneself better as reflected in another's eyes, as providing one of the benefits of friendship, and he also sees true friendship as modelled on true self-love. He further compares friendship with justice, and illustrates the ubiquity of friendship by referring to the way in which we help wayfarers as if they were kin (oikeion), a word he takes from Plato's discussion of love. In many of these respects he probably influenced the Stoic theory of justice as based on the natural kinship (oikeiotes) one feels initially for oneself at birth and, eventually, for lost wayfarers. Of the three commentaries translated here, that by the second-century AD Aristotelian Aspasius is the earliest extant commentary on Aristotle; the second is by Michael of Ephesus in the twelfth century; the third is of unknown date and authorship. Aspasius worries whether there is only one kind of friendship with a single definition.But he plumps for a verdict not given by Aristotle, that the primary kind of friendship serves as a focal point for defining the other two. Aspasius picks up connections with his Stoic contemporaries. Michael cites Christians and draws from Neoplatonists the idea that there is a self-aware part of the soul, and that Aristotle saw individuals as bundles of properties.

Publication:

Imprint:

Gerald Duckworth & Co Ltd

Returns:

Returnable

Some other items by this author:

AMMONIUS: ON ARISTOTLE ON INTERPRETATION 10-14 (HB)

ANDOKIDES AND THE HERMS (PB)

ANIMAL MINDS AND HUMAN MORALS (HB)

ANIMAL MINDS AND HUMAN MORALS (PB)

ANIMAL MINDS AND HUMAN MORALS: THE ORIGINS OF THE WESTERN DEBATE (PB)

ARISTOTLE ON MEMORY (PB)