|
|
|
Item Details
Title:
|
THE LOGIC OF CONSENT
THE DIVERSITY AND DECEPTIVENESS OF CONSENT AS A DEFENSE TO CRIMINAL CONDUCT |
By: |
Peter Westen, Professor Austin D. Sarat |
Format: |
Hardback |
List price:
|
£130.00 |
Our price: |
£117.00 |
Discount: |
|
You save:
|
£13.00 |
|
|
|
|
ISBN 10: |
0754624072 |
ISBN 13: |
9780754624073 |
Availability: |
Usually dispatched within 1-3 weeks.
Delivery
rates
|
Stock: |
Currently 0 available |
Publisher: |
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD |
Pub. date: |
4 June, 2004 |
Series: |
Law, Justice and Power |
Pages: |
392 |
Description: |
The Logic of Consent analyzes the varied nature of consent arguments in criminal law and examines the confusions that commonly arise from the failure of legislatures, courts and commentators to understand them. |
Synopsis: |
The Logic of Consent analyzes the varied nature of consent arguments in criminal law and examines the confusions that commonly arise from the failure of legislatures, courts and commentators to understand them. Peter Westen skillfully argues that the conceptual aspect accounts for a significant number of the difficulties that legislatures, courts and scholars have with consent in criminal cases; he observes that consent masquerades as a single kind of event when, in reality, it refers to diverse and sometimes mutually exclusive kinds of events. Specifically, consent is used in law to refer to three pairs of contrasting kinds of events: factual versus legal, attitudinal versus expressive, and prescriptive versus imputed. While Westen takes no position on whether the substance of existing defenses of consent in criminal law ought to be enlarged or reduced in scope, he examines each of these contrasting events and analyzes the normative confusions they produce. |
Publication: |
UK |
Imprint: |
Ashgate Publishing Limited |
Returns: |
Returnable |
|
|
|
|
Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr
A celebratory, inclusive and educational exploration of Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr for both children that celebrate and children who want to understand and appreciate their peers who do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|