 |
|
|
Item Details
| Title:
|
A COMMUNITARIAN DEFENSE OF LIBERALISM
EMILE DURKHEIM AND CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL THEORY |
| By: |
Mark S. Cladis |
| Format: |
Paperback |
| List price:
|
£29.99 |
| Our price: |
£25.49 |
| Discount: |
|
| You save:
|
£4.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ISBN 10: |
0804723656 |
| ISBN 13: |
9780804723657 |
| Availability: |
Not yet published. (You may still order this item, and we will dispatch your order as soon as it becomes available.)
 Delivery
rates
|
| Stock: |
Currently 0 available |
| Publisher: |
STANFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS |
| Pub. date: |
1 May, 1994 |
| Series: |
Stanford Series in Philosophy |
| Pages: |
352 |
| Description: |
In this provocative and timely reading of Emile Durkheim the author isolates the merits and liabilities of both liberal and communitarian theories and demonstrates that we need not be in the position of having to choose between them. |
| Synopsis: |
'Community, ' 'tradition, ' 'the individual', stand out prominently in today's intellectual landscape. In social and political theory and in religious studies they figure in the ongoing debates between liberals (champions of the individual) and communitarians (champions of the common good). With these debates and their potential conflict in mind, the author has constructed a timely reading of Emile Durkheim that captures the benefits associated with both liberalism and communitarianism. The book explores fundamental issues concerning freedom, rights, authority, public moral education, the relation between the public and the private, and the role of social criticism in democracies. Isolating the merits and liabilities of both liberal and communitarian theories, the author demonstrates that we need not be in the position of having to choose between them. |
| Publication: |
US |
| Imprint: |
Stanford University Press |
| Returns: |
Returnable |
|
|
|
 |
Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr
A celebratory, inclusive and educational exploration of Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr for both children that celebrate and children who want to understand and appreciate their peers who do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|