 |
|
|
Item Details
| Title:
|
REEL ARGUMENTS
FILM, PHILOSOPHY, AND SOCIAL CRITICISM |
| By: |
Andrew Light |
| Format: |
Paperback |
| List price:
|
£14.99 |
| Our price: |
£13.49 |
| Discount: |
|
| You save:
|
£1.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ISBN 10: |
0813365732 |
| ISBN 13: |
9780813365732 |
| Availability: |
Usually dispatched within 1-3 weeks.
 Delivery
rates
|
| Stock: |
Currently 0 available |
| Publisher: |
INGRAM PUBLISHER SERVICES US |
| Pub. date: |
24 January, 2003 |
| Pages: |
208 |
| Description: |
Reel Arguments collects an integrated series of essays addressing the role of film as social criticism. By looking at films and the creators of such films as Alice in the Cities , Enemy of the State , The Conversation , Falling Down , City of Hope , and Matewan , Light persuasively argues that film can be both highly philosophical and influential on public debates over issues of moral, political and social importance. Light brings new insights into the readings of these films covering a range of issues: identity politics, urban landscapes, the politics of space, and the unexpected ethical dimensions of technology. |
| Synopsis: |
Reel Arguments collects an integrated series of essays addressing the role of film as social criticism. By looking at films and the creators of such films as Alice in the Cities , Enemy of the State , The Conversation , Falling Down , City of Hope , and Matewan , Light persuasively argues that film can be both highly philosophical and influential on public debates over issues of moral, political and social importance. Light brings new insights into the readings of these films covering a range of issues: identity politics, urban landscapes, the politics of space, and the unexpected ethical dimensions of technology. |
| Publication: |
US |
| Imprint: |
Westview Press Inc |
| Returns: |
Returnable |
|
|
|
 |
Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr
A celebratory, inclusive and educational exploration of Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr for both children that celebrate and children who want to understand and appreciate their peers who do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|