| Synopsis: |
Costs Law Reports is the one authoritative source of costs law reporting. It includes important criminal decisions of Costs Judges, many of which are not available elsewhere. Cases in this issue: Mehjoo v Harben Barker (a Firm) and Another; Grupo Hotelero Urvasco SA v Carey Value Added SL and Another; Emezie v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Intrigue Shipping Inc and Others v Nikitin and Others; Wood and Hellard v Gorbunova and Others; HB v PB and Others; Hammersmatch Properties (Welwyn) Ltd v Saint-Gobain Ceramics and Plastics Ltd and Another; Sud v London Borough of Ealing; Vava and Others v Anglo American South Africa Ltd; Mackay and Bushby v Ashwood Enterprises Ltd and Others; Mengiste and Another v Endowment Fund for the Rehabilitation of Tigray and Others; R v McCatty; and R v Murray.Topics covered in these cases include: ATE insurance, application to set-aside, Calderbank offers, defendants' costs orders, delay, disclosure, discretion, dishonesty, employment tribunals, enforcement, expert evidence, family proceedings, hourly rates, indemnity or standard basis costs, interest, judicial recusal, judicial review, jurisdiction, no order as to costs, non-party costs orders, one way costs shifting, Part 36 offers, payments into court, payments on account, percentage-based or issue-based orders, private client, representation orders, set-off, stay, summary assessment, wasted costs orders, without notice applications, and witness statements. |